Skip to main content

Caleivent

Case Study Indoor Air Quality Gulf Coast, Florida

Hidden Humidity in a Tightly Sealed New Build

How a flawed ventilation and dehumidification configuration left a brand-new Gulf Coast home at 89% indoor humidity — and the smart IAQ upgrade that fixed it.

Location
Nokomis, Sarasota County, FL
Home
~1,850 sq ft, single story
Construction
Concrete block (CMU)
Roof
Asphalt shingle
Envelope
Open-cell spray foam (sealed attic)
Builder
National production homebuilder
First visit
June 2026
89%
Recommended indoor humidity is 45–55%. At 75°F and 89% RH, this home’s indoor dew point sat near 72°F — only a few degrees from saturation. Towels would not dry, surfaces stayed damp, and conditions favored mold. The equipment was new and running constantly, yet the house kept getting wetter.

↓  Download this case study (PDF)

01 · The SettingBackground

A newly married couple — recent transplants from New York to Florida’s Gulf Coast — moved into their newly built home in Nokomis, Sarasota County. Like many new homes in the region, it was built by a national production homebuilder to be tight and energy efficient: concrete block walls and an envelope sealed with open-cell spray foam, creating an unvented, semi-conditioned attic beneath an asphalt-shingle roof.

A sealed envelope is good for energy use, but it changes how a home behaves. With little natural air exchange, the house relies almost entirely on mechanical equipment to manage fresh air and moisture — there is no incidental leakage to “dry it out.” That makes correct design and commissioning essential. The home included a builder-installed system: a builder-grade ducted dehumidifier with outdoor fresh air ducted into it and tied into the HVAC return. Shortly after moving in, the couple noticed unusual system behavior.

In the homeowners’ words

“The A/C fan seems to be running all the time. We’re not really sure what it’s doing, but we’re concerned our electric bill is going to be much higher than it should be.”

The couple kept the thermostat at 75°F and felt comfortable, but weren’t sure the home felt as dry as it should:

“Our bath towels don’t seem to dry whatsoever.”

That proved to be a key clue. When indoor air is near saturation, it cannot absorb more moisture — so towels and damp surfaces stay wet far longer than they should.

02 · What We MeasuredInitial Findings

Indoors 75°F, 89% RHOutdoors 91°F, 87% RH

At 89% indoor relative humidity, the home was operating well above recommended levels. At 75°F and 89% RH the dew point is roughly 72°F — only a few degrees from saturation, enough to keep textiles damp, fog cool surfaces, and create conditions where mold can take hold.

Indoor RHCondition
45% – 55%Ideal target range for comfort and material durability
Above 60%Elevated — should be monitored and corrected
Above 70%Mold colonization risk increases significantly
Above 80%Severe moisture conditions; damage to finishes likely
89% measuredThis home at the initial visit — well into the severe range

03 · Why It Mattered HereWhy This Home Was Especially Vulnerable

The features that make this home efficient also make it unforgiving of a mis-configured system:

  • Concrete block walls and a foam-sealed envelope mean very low infiltration — excess moisture has no easy way out.
  • The open-cell foam, unvented attic places the roof deck inside the moisture boundary, so reliable humidity control protects the structure, not just comfort.
  • With incidental drying gone, the mechanical equipment is the home’s only defense; set up wrong, humidity climbs and stays high.

04 · Root Cause AnalysisA Flawed Design Configuration

The air handler fan had been wired through the dehumidifier controls and ran continuously, with outdoor fresh air ducted into the dehumidifier and then into the HVAC return. This is one of the wiring and airflow methods shown in the equipment’s own installation manual — a manufacturer-sanctioned approach — but it is not the optimum method for humidity control, and the resulting configuration was flawed for this home. The equipment was not broken; the as-installed design itself carries part of the blame for the elevated humidity.

Two aspects of the configuration drove humidity up rather than down:

  • Continuous blower operation. With the fan running non-stop, moisture that condenses on the cooling coil re-evaporates between cycles and is carried back into the home instead of draining away.
  • Unmanaged fresh-air introduction. Routing outdoor air through the dehumidifier and into the return, with no independent control of how much enters or when, let hot, humid air mix in faster than it could be dried.

In short, the system was installed “by the book,” but the chosen method was a poor fit for a sealed, block-and-foam home in a hot, humid climate. Because the flaw lies in the design itself, recommissioning the existing layout offers limited upside. The result: a blower running continuously, unmanaged outdoor air, humidity control severely compromised at 89% RH, and higher-than-necessary energy use.

A Wider Industry Concern

This raises a larger concern. A national builder operating at scale in Florida’s humid climate — working from a mechanical design that would typically be reviewed and signed off by a licensed Professional Engineer (PE) — still produced a humidity-prone configuration that passed inspection. That points beyond a single home to a systemic gap: the industry may lack practical expertise in humidity control for tightly sealed homes, along with modern, comprehensive, easy-to-install equipment built to solve it. It is exactly the gap a complete, well-integrated IAQ system is designed to close.

05 · The OptionsRecommended Solutions

Two paths were presented to the homeowners: repair and recommission the existing system, or replace it with a dedicated smart indoor-air-quality (IAQ) system.

CapabilityOption 1
Repair existing system
Option 2
CaleiVent Smart IAQ
Homeowner cost$2,770$6,625
Humidity & temperature controlYes (after recommissioning)Yes
Dedicated ventilation ductingNo — shares existing HVACYes — dedicated supply & return
CO2 / VOC / PM2.5 monitoringNoYes
Intelligent ventilation controlNoYes
FiltrationBasic MERV-11 style3-stage + UV-C (HEPA-grade final)
Mobile app & remote alertsNoYes
Energy optimizationNot optimizedOptimized

Option 1 — Repair the existing system ($2,770)

This means reworking ducting, adding dampers, rewiring controls, reprogramming, rebalancing airflow, and verification testing. Even corrected, it offers no CO2, VOC, or particulate monitoring, no intelligent ventilation control, and no remote alerts or energy optimization — and outdoor air still enters through a basic MERV-11-style filter that does little to stop pollen, smoke, or emissions.

Option 2 — Upgrade to a CaleiVent Smart IAQ System ($6,625)

The homeowners chose this option, which includes:

  • Dedicated supply and return ducting, independent of the existing HVAC system, with the old A/C duct penetration sealed.
  • CaleiVent whole-home dehumidification, ventilation, and IAQ management unit.
  • Indoor air quality monitor.
  • Mobile app integration over Wi-Fi, with custom IAQ alerts and notifications.
  • Advanced 3-stage filtration: pre-filter, activated carbon pellet filter, and an E13 HEPA-grade final filter.
  • UV-C H-Cell germicidal assembly with lamp-life preserver.

Once installed, the system continuously monitors relative humidity, temperature, carbon dioxide (CO2), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), and fine particulate matter (PM2.5).

06 · Path ForwardNext Steps & Results

Installation is scheduled within the coming weeks, with a follow-up visit recommended after start-up to verify performance and document the improvement in indoor conditions.

Results after installation — to be completed after commissioning Placeholder for post-installation data — e.g., indoor RH back in the 45–55% range, normalized blower runtime, and CO2/VOC/PM2.5 readings in the app. Add measured before/after figures and a homeowner quote once available.